Marroquin

(PC) Brown v. Marroquin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20241:21-cv-00087California2,553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY E. BROWN, No. 1:21-cv-00087 NODJ GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

OTTO MARROQUIN, et al., (ECF No. 38) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel discovery. ECF No. 38. Defendants have filed an opposition (ECF No. 40), and the time for Plaintiff to file a reply has expired. See Local Rule 230(l). For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied. I. MOTION TO COMPEL A. Plaintiff’s Motion In Plaintiff’s motion to compel it appears that he has requested documents from Defendants but they have either not produced them, or not produced them for viewing, and are “stone walling”. ECF No. 38 at 3. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.