Marroquin

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOBBY E. BROWN, No. 1:21-cv-00087 NODJ GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

14 OTTO MARROQUIN, et al., (ECF No. 38) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel discovery. ECF No. 38. Defendants have filed an 21 opposition (ECF No. 40), and the time for Plaintiff to file a reply has expired. See Local Rule 22 230(l). For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied. 23 I. MOTION TO COMPEL 24 A. Plaintiff’s Motion 25 In Plaintiff’s motion to compel it appears that he has requested documents from 26 Defendants but they have either not produced them, or not produced them for viewing, and are 27 “stone walling”. ECF No. 38 at 3. …