Randall

Randall v. Trans Union, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20241:23-cv-01547California360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WHITNEY RANDALL, Case No. 1:23-cv-01547-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT

v. TRANS UNION, LLC AS A PARTY IN

THIS ACTION

TRANS UNION, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 13) Defendants.

16 On February 21, 2024, the parties1 filed a stipulation of dismissal of Defendant Trans Union, LLC, only, with prejudice and without an award of fees or costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 13.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir. 2005) (The Ninth Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.