Randall

Randall v. Trans Union, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20241:23-cv-01547California360 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 WHITNEY RANDALL, Case No. 1:23-cv-01547-JLT-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT

13 v. TRANS UNION, LLC AS A PARTY IN

THIS ACTION

14 TRANS UNION, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 13) 15 Defendants.

16 17 On February 21, 2024, the parties1 filed a stipulation of dismissal of Defendant Trans 18 Union, LLC, only, with prejudice and without an award of fees or costs pursuant to Federal Rule 19 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 13.) 20 Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all 21 of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 22 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The 23 plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through 24 a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 687 25 (9th Cir. 2005) (The Ninth Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.