Molina

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Molina

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20241:23-cv-01553California2,418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 1:23-cv-01553-CDB

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISCHARGE AND DISMISSAL OF INTERPLEADER v. PLAINTIFF AND FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES CONCEPCION FLORES MOLINA, et al., (Doc. 14) Defendants.

CONCEPCION FLORES MOLINA,

18 Cross Claimant, 19 v. 20 LUPE C. NUNES a/k/a LUPE FLORES, 21 Cross Defendant. 22 23 Pending before the Court is the stipulation of all parties to this action (Interpleader Plaintiff Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), Defendant Concepcion Flores Molina and Defendant Lupe C. Nunes) to dismiss and discharge MetLife and for award attorney’s fees. (Doc. 27 28 14). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will discharge and dismiss MetLife and award attorney’s fees and costs as requested by the parties. Background According to the allegations of the complaint, Vincent R. Flores (the “Decedent”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.