Baraona

(PC) Puckett v. Baraona

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20241:21-cv-01448California886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-NODJ-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

ADJUDICATION OF MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RENEWED

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

BARAONA, et al., COUNSEL Defendants. (ECF No. 78) 16 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants A. Baraona, R. Burnitzki,1 R. Leos, H. Hernandez, E. Diaz, and Doe 1 for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, R. Martinez, E. Ruiz, G. Meier,2 R. Gutierrez, J. Cruz, K. Allison (Cronister), and Jane Doe Nurse for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for adjudication of his motion for summary judgment and/or trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.