Baraona

(PC) Puckett v. Baraona

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20241:21-cv-01448California886 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-NODJ-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

ADJUDICATION OF MOTION FOR

13 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RENEWED

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

14 BARAONA, et al., COUNSEL 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 78) 16 17 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 19 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants A. Baraona, R. Burnitzki,1 R. Leos, H. 20 Hernandez, E. Diaz, and Doe 1 for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and 21 (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, R. Martinez, E. Ruiz, G. Meier,2 R. Gutierrez, J. Cruz, K. Allison 22 (Cronister), and Jane Doe Nurse for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 23 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for adjudication of his motion for 24 summary judgment and/or trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.