Baraona
(PC) Puckett v. Baraona
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-NODJ-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
ADJUDICATION OF MOTION FOR
13 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RENEWED
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
14 BARAONA, et al., COUNSEL 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 78) 16 17 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 19 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants A. Baraona, R. Burnitzki,1 R. Leos, H. 20 Hernandez, E. Diaz, and Doe 1 for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and 21 (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, R. Martinez, E. Ruiz, G. Meier,2 R. Gutierrez, J. Cruz, K. Allison 22 (Cronister), and Jane Doe Nurse for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 23 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for adjudication of his motion for 24 summary judgment and/or trial…