Osvaldik
Smith v. Osvaldik
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD SMITH, Case No. 1:23-cv-01488-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER TO CLERK TO ASSIGN CASE TO
DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
PETER OSVALDIK and T-MOBILE DISMISS ACTION
CORPORATION,
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Reginald Smith is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his First Amended Complaint. (Doc. Nos. 5, 7). On December 15, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s initial complaint and found it stated no cognizable claim, advised him of the pleading requirement and applicable law, and afforded him the opportunity to file an amended complaint. (Doc. No. 6). For the reasons set forth herein, the undersigned recommends the district court dismiss this case, without leave to further amend, because the First Amended Complaint fails to state a claim and any further amendments would be futile. APPLICABLE LAW Because Plaintiff is proceeding in form…