(HC) Williams v. Sacramento Main Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL WILLIAMS, No. 2:22-cv-02045 DB Petitioner, v. ORDER AND SACRAMENTO MAIN JAIL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondents. 16 A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than four hundred days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and petitioner has failed to notify the Court of a current address. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). Further, the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to randomly assign this action to a United States District Judge. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 …