Boudreaux

(PC) Christman v. Boudreaux

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20241:23-cv-00605California660 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PASCHAL A. CHRISTMAN JR., Case No. 1:23-cv-0605 JLT EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

13 v. DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK

14 MIKE BOUDREAUX, et al., OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 18) 16 17 Paschal A. Christman Jr. initiated this action by filing a complaint for violations of his 18 civil rights, identifying several incidents and conditions he experienced in various detention 19 facilities between 2022 and 2023. (See generally Doc. 1.) The assigned magistrate judge 20 screened the compliant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found he failed to state a 21 cognizable claim. (Doc. 9.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend, but Plaintiff failed to file 22 an amended complaint. 23 The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action and failed to comply 24 with the Court’s orders. (Doc. 18 at 2.) Therefore, the magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.