Boudreaux

(PC) Christman v. Boudreaux

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20241:23-cv-00605California660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PASCHAL A. CHRISTMAN JR., Case No. 1:23-cv-0605 JLT EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK

MIKE BOUDREAUX, et al., OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE Defendants. (Doc. 18) 16 Paschal A. Christman Jr. initiated this action by filing a complaint for violations of his civil rights, identifying several incidents and conditions he experienced in various detention facilities between 2022 and 2023. (See generally Doc. 1.) The assigned magistrate judge screened the compliant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found he failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 9.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend, but Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action and failed to comply with the Court’s orders. (Doc. 18 at 2.) Therefore, the magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.