Ramadan

(PC) Ponce v. Ramadan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20241:23-cv-01193California347 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PABLO JESUS PONCE, 1:23-cv-1193 JLT SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THIS

13 v. ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

OBEY COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

14 RAMADAN, et al., PROSECUTE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK

OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

15 Defendants. (Doc. 13) 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to obey court orders 19 and failed to prosecute the action after he failed to respond to the Court’s screening order in any 20 way, including by filing an amended complaint. (Doc. 13 at 2, 4.) Therefore, the magistrate judge 21 recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 4.) 22 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that 23 any objections were due within 21 days. (Doc. 13 at 4-5.) The Court advised him that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.