Lewis
Lewis v. Zeno
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD LEWIS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00079-NODJ-BAM 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
13 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. 20) 14 HERBERT ZENO, et al., FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Richard Lewis’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for 18 default judgment against Defendant Herbert Zeno and Defendant Unknown Riders M.C. 19 (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 20.) The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Defendants did not file an opposition to the 21 motion, and the time in which to do so has passed. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition . . . to the granting 22 of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days 23 after the motion was filed”.) 24 On February 15, 2024, the Court vacated the hearing on this matter and indicated that the 25 motion would be taken under…