Zimmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL DEREK JACKSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01223-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CASE1

v. (Doc. No. 12) DARRELL WORTHY and CYNTHIA

WORTHY, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

15 Defendants.

17 Pending review before the Court is Plaintiff’s pro se First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 12). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that the district court dismiss this action because the First Amended Complaint fails to state a cognizable federal claim and any further amendments would be futile. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case “at any time” if the Court determines, inter alia, the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state claim on which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from

This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28…