(SS) Medina v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRADLEY MEDINA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00896-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
v. PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH A COURT ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. 12) Defendant.
16 17 Bradley Medina (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. 1).1 On June 15, 2023, the Court issued a scheduling order setting forth the parties’ briefing deadlines. (Doc. 5). Further, the Court notified the parties “[v]iolations of this [scheduling] order or of the federal rules of procedure or the Local Rules may result in sanctions pursuant to Local Rule 110.” Id. at 3. On August 14, 2023, the Commissioner, complying with the Court’s scheduling order, timely lodged a copy of the administrative record. (Doc. 11).