(SS) Medina v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 BRADLEY MEDINA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00896-CDB
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
13 v. PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH A COURT ORDER
14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. 12) 15 Defendant.
16 17 18 Bradley Medina (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, seeks judicial review of a final decision of 19 the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application 20 for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. 1).1 21 On June 15, 2023, the Court issued a scheduling order setting forth the parties’ briefing 22 deadlines. (Doc. 5). Further, the Court notified the parties “[v]iolations of this [scheduling] order 23 or of the federal rules of procedure or the Local Rules may result in sanctions pursuant to Local 24 Rule 110.” Id. at 3. 25 On August 14, 2023, the Commissioner, complying with the Court’s scheduling order, 26 timely lodged a copy of the administrative record. (Doc. 11).