Fust
Fust v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 DEBORAH FUST, INDIVIDUALLY AND No. 2:23-cv-2853 WBS DB
ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED; AND EDWARD
PIMENTEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON
BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SITUATED,
15 Plaintiffs, 16 v.
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., A
DELAWARE CORPORATION REGISTERED
TO DO BUSINESS AND HEADQUARTERED
IN CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 21 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiffs Deborah Fust and Edward Pimentel originally filed this putative class action against defendant Gilead Sciences, Inc. (“Gilead”) in Shasta County Superior Court, seeking monetary and equitable relief pursuant to California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Claim 1); False Advertising Law (Claim 2); Unfair Competition Law (Claim 3); money had and received (Claim 4); negligent misrepresentation (Claim 5); and unjust enrichment (Claim 6). Plaintiffs allege that defendant exaggerated the benefits and downplayed the dangers of its drug 4 …