Gomez

(PC) Hawkins v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20242:21-cv-02302California564 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICKY HAWKINS, Case No. 2:21-cv-02302-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL AND GRANTING

14 O. GOMEZ, et al., PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS TO FILE AN

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

15 Defendants. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 ECF No. 65 17 OPPOSITION DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 18 19 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought 20 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 24, 2023, defendants filed a partial motion for summary 21 judgment. ECF No. 59. After plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition, 22 I issued an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed based on his failure to 23 prosecute and to comply with court orders. ECF No. 64. Plaintiff filed a response to the order to 24 show cause and a motion to appoint counsel. ECF No. 65. In it,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.