Gomez

(PC) Hawkins v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20242:21-cv-02302California564 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKY HAWKINS, Case No. 2:21-cv-02302-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL AND GRANTING

O. GOMEZ, et al., PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS TO FILE AN

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

Defendants. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ECF No. 65 OPPOSITION DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 18 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 24, 2023, defendants filed a partial motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 59. After plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition, I issued an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed based on his failure to prosecute and to comply with court orders. ECF No. 64. Plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause and a motion to appoint counsel. ECF No. 65. In it,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.