Phillip

(PC) Lewis v. Phillip

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20241:23-cv-01715California384 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL DIXON LEWIS, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01715-JLT-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

13 v. PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

PAY FILING FEE

14 B. PHILLIP, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff Paul Dixon Lewis is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 22, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 19 recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, because Plaintiff has 20 accrued three or more strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and failed to show he was in imminent 21 danger of serious physical injury. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff did not file any objections and the time to do 22 so expired. On January 19, 2024, the Court adopted the findings and recommendations and denied 23 Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff was ordered to pay the 24 $405 filing fee within 21 days of the date of service of the order. (Id. at 2.) The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.