(HC)McCoy
(HC)McCoy v. Warden at USP Atwater
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REGGIE L. MCCOY, Case No. 1:24-cv-00121-NODJ-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DENY MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
13 [Doc. 10] 14 v. [21-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] 15
16 WARDEN, USP ATWATER, 17 Respondent. 18 19 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 20 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After conducting a preliminary review of the 21 petition, on January 30, 2024, the Court found that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Petitioner’s 22 claims and issued Findings and Recommendations to dismiss the petition. On February 16, 2024, 23 Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations which are awaiting decision by 24 a district judge. 25 On February 21, 2024, Petitioner filed the instant motion for injunctive relief. (Doc. 10.) 26 Petitioner reasserts his claim that the judgment is void because the Return to the Judgment and 27 Commitment Order was signed by the Warden and…