(PC) Edwards v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20241:23-cv-01180California787 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KADEEM EDWARDS, 1:23-cv-01180-NODJ-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF (Doc. 16)

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION Following screening, on December 4, 2023, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss Claims and Defendants. (Doc. 13.) The Court recommended that this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Jane Doe L.V.N., the remaining claims in Plaintiff’s complaint to be dismissed, and that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and John Does 1 through 10 be dismissed from this action. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff was afforded 14 days within which to file any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.