Clayborne

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN DEVAN DANIEL, No. 2:22–cv–1350–DJC–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF Nos. 26, 28, 31, 32.) 14 ROBERT CLAYBORNE, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a 18 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On January 3, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 (ECF No. 32), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) 22 days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of 23 fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The 24 magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley 25 Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 26 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause 27 appearing,…