Singh

(PC) Turner v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20242:23-cv-00954California1,386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAFONZO R. TURNER, No. 2:23-cv-0954 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SINGH, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants improperly confiscated his durable medical equipment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for stay (ECF No. 19) and his motion for clarification (ECF No. 21). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant the motion for clarification and recommend that the motion for stay be denied. I. Background Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 1.) The undersigned determined the action should be transferred to the Fresno Division of the Eastern District because it appeared from the allegations that the events giving rise to plaintiff’s claim took place at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.