(PC) Flow-Sunkett v. T. Redmon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20241:21-cv-01137California602 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLENN S. SUNKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01137-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER NOTING VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.

v. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) OF T. REDMON and T. BOERUM, CERTAIN CLAIMS Defendants. (Doc. No. 40) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REVISE

DOCKET

17 Plaintiff Glenn S. Sunkett, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 22, 2024, this Court issued a screening order on Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). (Doc. No. 39). As discussed in the Court’s screening order, the TAC states cognizable Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against Defendants Redmon and Boerum but fails to state any other cognizable claim. (Id. at 10). The Screening Order afforded Plaintiff the opportunity to either (1) file a notice under Rule 41 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 that he is willing to proceed only on the claims the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.