B. R. L. v. Clinica Sierra Vista

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20241:21-cv-01445California543 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 B.R.L., by and through his Guardian Ad Case No. 1:21-cv-01445-JLT-CDB Litem, FRANCHESCA LARA, and 9 MIGUEL LARA, ORDER REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD

10 Plaintiffs, NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO

TIMELY FILE PETITION(S) FOR MINOR’S

11 v. COMPROMISE

12 ADVENTIST HEALTH (Doc. 39) BAKERSFIELD, et al., 13 THREE-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 14

15 B.R.L., by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Franchesca Lara, and Miguel Lara, bring 16 this medical malpractice action alleging negligence by health care providers prior to B.R.L.’s 17 birth. (Doc. 1). 18 On December 22, 2023, the parties filed a joint pre-trial conference statement which 19 informed the Court that Defendant San Joaquin Community Hospital d/b/a Adventist Health 20 Bakersfield reached an agreement to settle claims between itself and Plaintiffs and that Plaintiffs 21 intend to file a petition for minor’s compromise in connection with that settlement.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.