(SS) Tavita v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20241:24-cv-00147California1,162 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 RAYMOND D. TAVITA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00147-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ISSUE

SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER, AND

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS

15 Defendant. (Docs. 2, 6) 16

17 18 Plaintiff Raymond D. Tavita (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this matter and seeks 19 judicial review of an administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying 20 Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. 1). Pending before 21 the Court is Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2). The Court held 22 Plaintiff’s application in abeyance until he submitted copies of the Commissioner’s final decision 23 as well as the notice he received from the Appeals Council. (Doc. 3). Thereafter, Plaintiff 24 complied with the Court’s order and filed the requested documents on February 20, 2024. (Doc. 25 6). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.