Lester

(PS) Mandujano v. Lester

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20242:23-cv-02385California808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YANAH MANDUJANO, No. 2:23-cv-02385-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. KATHERINE LESTER, ET AL. Defendants. 16 On January 18, 2024, defendants Rob Bonta and Katherine Lester filed motions to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF Nos. 5, 8.) Defendant Darren Pytel filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint on January 22, 2024. (ECF No. 9.) Defendants noticed their motions for hearings to take place on March 6, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. (ECF Nos. 5, 8, 9.) Pursuant to this court’s Local Rules, any opposition to the motion was to be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the motion was filed. Further, a responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion is required to serve and file a statement of non-opposition. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“[a] responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.