(PS) Hedrington v. David Grant Medical Center

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ORLONZO HEDRINGTON, No. 2:23-cv-00801 TLN CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER, et FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff Orlonzo Hedrington proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 19 1983 and/or Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 20 388 (1971) (“Bivens”). (See ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21), this matter is before 21 the undersigned for these findings and recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 22 A motion to dismiss filed by defendant, City of Fairfield (sued as “Fairfield Police 23 Department” and hereinafter “defendant”) is before the court. (ECF No. 46.) The motion is fully 24 briefed with plaintiff’s opposition and defendant’s reply. (ECF Nos. 50, 51.) This matter is 25 appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 302(g). For the reasons set forth 26 below, the motion should be granted. 27 //// 28 //// 1 …