(PC) Rannels v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL W. RANNELS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00049-NODJ-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. DEFENDANTS PUYAGOYA AND

SOMMERS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

SMITH, et al., FROM THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION

Defendants. TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE

30-DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Daniel W. Rannels is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Smith, Tortrice, Sommers and Puyagoya. I. BACKGROUND Following screening of the second amended complaint, this Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate on February 5, 2024. (Doc. 33.) Service of Defendants Steve Smith, Stoc Tortrice, Sommers and Puyagoya was to be effected under the Court’s e-service pilot program. (Id. at…