(PC) Rannels v. Smith

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL W. RANNELS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00049-NODJ-SKO (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

13 v. DEFENDANTS PUYAGOYA AND

SOMMERS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

14 SMITH, et al., FROM THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION

15 Defendants. TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE

16 30-DAY DEADLINE

17

18 19 Plaintiff Daniel W. Rannels is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought 20 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate 21 indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Smith, Tortrice, Sommers and 22 Puyagoya. 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 Following screening of the second amended complaint, this Court issued its Order Finding 25 Service Appropriate on February 5, 2024. (Doc. 33.) Service of Defendants Steve Smith, Stoc 26 Tortrice, Sommers and Puyagoya was to be effected under the Court’s e-service pilot program. 27 (Id. at…