Movey

(PC) Lorenz v. Movey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20241:23-cv-01243California400 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK LORENZ, No. 1:23-cv-01243-NODJ-SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

13 v. CERTAIN CLAIMS 14 MOVEY, et al., (ECF No. 14) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Patrick Lorenz is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 26, 2024, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and 21 recommendations, recommending this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 22 excessive force claim against Defendant Movey and Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to 23 serious medical needs claim against Defendant Campbell, with any remaining claims against any 24 defendant to be dismissed. (ECF No. 14.) The findings and recommendations were served on 25 Plaintiff and contained notice that any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.