Storm
Storm v. Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL STORM, No. 1:23-cv-00315-NODJ-SKO
Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A
DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND
ARAMARK MANAGEMENT CLOSE THE CASE SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., (Doc. 13)
16 Defendants. 17
18 On February 23, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. 13.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this matter and thereafter close this case. 24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: February 26, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28