(PC) Richson-Bey v. Palmer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 SEAN JEFFERY RICHSON-BEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00778-NODJ-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THE CASE AS DUPLICATIVE v. OF CASE NO. 1:23-cv-463-JLT-SAB AND TO DENY MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
WILLIAM PALMER, ET AL., PLEADINGS (ECF NO. 10)
14 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
16 17 Plaintiff Sean Richson-Bey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed the operative complaint on May 22, 2023. (ECF No. 1). 19 Plaintiff generally claims that his ongoing criminal state court proceedings are not being 20 conducted fairly, and he sues parties connected with that prosecution: three judges of the Kings 21 County Superior Court, two deputy district attorneys, and a court-appointed counsel. 22 For the following reasons, the Court recommends that this action be dismissed as 23 duplicative of Richson-Bey v. Palmer, No. 1:23-cv-00463-JLT-SAB (Richson-Bey I). 24…