Orr

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD, No. 2:19-cv-01289-DJC-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 F. ORR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 15, 2023, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 18 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion 19 despite being warned of the consequences for failing to do so and being granted an extension of 20 time. ECF Nos. 81, 83. The extended deadline has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded 21 to the court’s order. 22 “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the district court may dismiss an 23 action for failure to comply with any order of the court.” Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 24 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). In determining whether a dismissal is appropriate, the court considers five 25 factors. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992). These factors include: “(1) the public’s 26 interest in expeditious resolution of…