Lemus

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IGNACIO LEMUS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00050-JLT-HBK 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER FINDING

COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A CLAIM

13 v. AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN

AMENDED COMPLAINT, STAND ON

14 VISALIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, and COMPLAINT, OR FILE VOLUNTARY

DOES 1-3, DISMISSAL1

15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 1) 16

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

17 18 This matter is before the Court for screening. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff, 19 Ignacio Lemus, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 20 alleging various constitutional violations. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Upon review, the Court 21 finds the Complaint fails to state any claim. The Court affords Plaintiff the option to file an 22 amended complaint or voluntarily dismiss his Complaint before recommending the district court 23 dismiss this action. 24 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 25 A plaintiff may bring an action under 42 U.S.C. §…