Tate
(PC) Womack v. Tate
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, Case No.: 1:19-cv-00614-NODJ-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION TO
v. COMPEL RESPONSES TO
INTERROGATORIES
H. TATE, et al., (Doc. 78) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Rodney Jerome Womack is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On July 14, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe issued an Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories. (Doc. 74.) Plaintiff was ordered to provide supplemental responses to Defendant’s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 3, 4, 10, 11, 16, 18, 19, 20, and 21) and a statement affirming that his previous interrogatory responses, as well as his supplemental responses, were all made under oath, no later than August 18, 2023. (Id. at 10.) On September 8, 2023, Judge McAuliffe granted Plaintiff an extension of…