(PC) Khademi v. Legislation of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20242:23-cv-01861California263 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:23-cv-1861 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. 14 LEGISLATION OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed January 11, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing 19 fee within thirty days prior to proceeding any further with this action. ECF No. 8. The thirty-day 20 period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 prejudice. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.