Wright

Wright v. Rash Curtis & Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20241:23-cv-00237California140 words

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICTORIA WRIGHT, No. 1:23-cv-00237-JLT-SKO

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE

THE CASE

14 RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, INC., (Doc. 17) 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 On February 27, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 19 prejudice. (Doc. 17.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 20 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 21 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: February 27, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 25

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26 27 28