Wright

Wright v. Rash Curtis & Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20241:23-cv-00237California140 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTORIA WRIGHT, No. 1:23-cv-00237-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE

THE CASE

RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, INC., (Doc. 17) 15 Defendant. 16

17 On February 27, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. 17.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: February 27, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 25

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26 27 28