Castillo
(PC) Handy v. Castillo
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL HANDY, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01160-NODJ-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO
13 v. STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF
CAN BE GRANTED FOLLOWING
14 DAVID CASTILLO, SCREENING OF PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
15 Defendant. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16
17
18 Plaintiff Michael Handy is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 The Court issued its First Screening Order on June 8, 2023. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff’s original 22 complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and Plaintiff was granted 23 leave to file an amended complaint. (Id.) When Plaintiff did not file a first amended complaint 24 following issuance of the screening order, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations to 25 Dismiss Action for Failure to Obey Court Orders and Failure to Prosecute on…