Castillo

(PC) Handy v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20241:22-cv-01160California2,907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HANDY, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01160-NODJ-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF

CAN BE GRANTED FOLLOWING

DAVID CASTILLO, SCREENING OF PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendant. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Plaintiff Michael Handy is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION The Court issued its First Screening Order on June 8, 2023. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff’s original complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint. (Id.) When Plaintiff did not file a first amended complaint following issuance of the screening order, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss Action for Failure to Obey Court Orders and Failure to Prosecute on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.