Burns

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISAAC DURAN, Case No. 1:21-cv-01290-JLT-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED ON

13 v. COGNIZABLE CLAIMS AND DISMISS

REMAINING CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS1

14 J. BURNS, W. CERVANTES, G. LOR, E. CURIEL, O. VALLADOLID, and S. 14-DAY OBJRCTION PERIOD 15 BARTOLO., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Isaac Duran initiated this while a prisoner by filing a pro se civil rights action 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). As more fully set forth below, the 20 undersigned finds the Complaint states cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claims 21 against Defendants Burns, Cervantes, Lor, Bartolo, Valladolid, and Curiel, and cognizable Eighth 22 Amendment failure to intervene claims against Defendants Cervantes, Lor, Bartolo, Valladolid, 23 and Curiel, but fails to state any other cognizable claim. Therefore, the undersigned recommends 24 that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on the above claims…