Burns

(PC) Duran v. Burns

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20241:21-cv-01290California4,985 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISAAC DURAN, Case No. 1:21-cv-01290-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED ON

v. COGNIZABLE CLAIMS AND DISMISS

REMAINING CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS1

J. BURNS, W. CERVANTES, G. LOR, E. CURIEL, O. VALLADOLID, and S. 14-DAY OBJRCTION PERIOD BARTOLO., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Isaac Duran initiated this while a prisoner by filing a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). As more fully set forth below, the undersigned finds the Complaint states cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Burns, Cervantes, Lor, Bartolo, Valladolid, and Curiel, and cognizable Eighth Amendment failure to intervene claims against Defendants Cervantes, Lor, Bartolo, Valladolid, and Curiel, but fails to state any other cognizable claim. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on the above claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.