(PS) Aussieker v. TSHB, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK AUSSIEKER, No. 2:22-cv-01886-DAD-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING IN
14 TSHB, LLC, et al., PART AND DENYING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT
15 Defendants. JUDGMENT 16 (Doc. Nos. 11, 15) 17 18 On October 21, 2022, plaintiff Mark Aussieker filed this civil action against defendants 19 TSHB, LLC and Nico Contreras. (Doc. No. 1.) The Clerk of the Court entered default as to 20 defendants because they were served with the summons and complaint and did not file a timely 21 answer, responsive pleading, or otherwise appear in this action. (Doc. Nos. 5, 6, 7.) On May 25, 22 2023, plaintiff filed the pending motion for default judgment. (Doc. No. 11.) This matter was 23 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 302. 24 On February 1, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and…