Zamudio

Zamudio v. Aerotek, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 20241:21-cv-01673California2,147 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DIANA VEGA ZAMUDIO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01673-JLT-CDB

9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING

10 v. RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

11 AEROTEK, INC, et al., (Docs. 43, 49) 12 Defendants. 13 14 Pending before the Court are the motions of Defendant Aerotek Inc. (“Aerotek”) and 15 Caterpillar Inc. (“Caterpillar”) to stay this case pending resolution of a separate motion to compel 16 arbitration. Aerotek filed its motion to stay on December 5, 2023 (Doc. 43), which is joined by 17 Caterpillar (Doc. 45). Plaintiff filed an opposition on December 19, 2023 (Doc. 47), and Aerotek 18 filed a reply on December 29, 2023 (Doc. 51). Caterpillar separately moved to stay on December 19 21, 2023, which is unopposed. (Doc. 49). For the reasons set forth below, the Court shall stay 20 discovery in this action until the Court rules on Aerotek’s renewed motion to compel arbitration.1 21 I. Background 22 Aerotek is a temporary staffing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.