United States v. Marble Mountain Ranch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 20242:21-cv-02391California621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:21-cv-02391 WBS DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

INTERVENE1

MARBLE MOUNTAIN RANCH, INC.;

DOUGLAS T. COLE; HEIDI A. COLE;

NORMAN D. COLE; and CAROLYN T.

COLE,

17 Defendants. 18 ----oo0oo---- The United States government brought this action pertaining to fire suppression costs and other damages caused by the Marble Fire. (See Docket No. 1.) The parties settled the case on July 14, 2023. (See Docket No. 29.) On February 1, 2024, Konrad Fisher moved pro se to permissively intervene in this case, stating that the Marble Fire damaged his property and

This matter was taken under submission without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The scheduled April 1, 2024 hearing on the motion is hereby VACATED. that he is concerned the settlement between the parties will leave inadequate insurance funds to cover…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.