United States v. Marble Mountain Ranch
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:21-cv-02391 WBS DMC 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
INTERVENE1
15 MARBLE MOUNTAIN RANCH, INC.;
DOUGLAS T. COLE; HEIDI A. COLE;
16 NORMAN D. COLE; and CAROLYN T.
COLE,
17 Defendants. 18 19 ----oo0oo---- 20 The United States government brought this action 21 pertaining to fire suppression costs and other damages caused by 22 the Marble Fire. (See Docket No. 1.) The parties settled the 23 case on July 14, 2023. (See Docket No. 29.) On February 1, 24 2024, Konrad Fisher moved pro se to permissively intervene in 25 this case, stating that the Marble Fire damaged his property and 26
27 1 This matter was taken under submission without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The scheduled April 1, 28 2024 hearing on the motion is hereby VACATED. 1 that he is concerned the settlement between the parties will 2 leave inadequate insurance funds to cover…