(SS) Aninion v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 20241:24-cv-00243California614 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

2 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 VIRGIL PARAMI ANINION, CASE NUMBER: 1:24-cv-00243-GSA 7 Plaintiff, 8 FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY 9 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO 10 Social Security, REQUIRE FILING FEE PAYMENT,

AND DIRECTING CLERK TO

11 RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED Defendant. STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 (Doc. 2) 13

14

15

16

17 Plaintiff moves to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Docs. 1–2. 18 I. Legal Standard 19 In order to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, a Plaintiff must submit an 20 affidavit demonstrating that s/he “is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915(a)(1). “To proceed in forma pauperis is a privilege not a right.” Smart v. Heinze, 347 22 F.2d 114, 116 (9th Cir. 1965). In enacting the in forma pauperis statute, “Congress intended to 23 guarantee that no citizen shall be denied an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.