(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 20242:22-cv-02044California4,006 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISRAEL MODESTO MARTINEZ, No. 2:22-cv-02044 AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 (“Commissioner”), denying his application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II 20 of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34.1 For the reasons that follow, 21 plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED, and defendant’s cross-motion for 22 summary judgment will be DENIED. 23 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 24 Plaintiff applied for DIB on May 18, 2020, alleging disability due to brain aneurysm and 25 vision impairment. Administrative Record (“AR”) 89, 204.2 The disability onset date was

26 1 DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.