(PS) Hatton v. Nevada County Behavioral Health

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD JAMES BRUCE HATTON, No. 2:23-cv-01970-WBS-KJN (PS)

SR,

ORDER Plaintiff, 13 v.

NEVADA COUNTY BEHAVIORAL

HEALTH, Defendant. 17 On February 6, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed by the deadline, and so the court is entitled to presume that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). However, plaintiff did file a document regarding a magistrate consent form, which the court construes broadly as late objections. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to file objections by the deadline could waive the…