Quick

(PC) Torres v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 20241:22-cv-01536California683 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-NODJ-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff,

11 v. ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS 12 FROM PARTIES REGARDING

SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY

13 JAYSON QUICK, et al.,

14 Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 15

16 17 Edward Torres is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Plaintiff filed his Complaint on November 30, 2022. (ECF No. 1). He alleged that in late 20 March or April of 2019, he was assaulted by correctional officers Quick, Garza, Garcia, Valadez, 21 Prince, and Martinez, and that nurse Ontiveros denied him medical care for his injuries. (Id.) 22 After screening, this case proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force and failure 23 to protect claims against the correctional officers and the Eighth Amendment claim against 24 defendant Ontiveros for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. (ECF Nos. 13, 14, 25 18, 22). 26 All Defendants have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.