(SS) Black v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20241:23-cv-01159California4,709 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

2 3

4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 12 CLARESSA LAVOIE BLACK, Case No. 1:23-cv-01159-EPG 13 Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

14 v. SECURITY COMPLAINT 15 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 1, 12).

16 Defendant. 17 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an 20 unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding her 21 application for disability and supplemental security income benefits. The parties have consented 22 to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 23 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 10). 24 Plaintiff argues as follows: 25 1. The ALJ’s residual functional capacity [RFC] assessment is not supported by substantial evidence. 26 2. The ALJ failed to provide clear and convincing reasons to reject the subjective 27 limitations of [Plaintiff]. 28 (ECF No. 12, pp. 5, 10 (minor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.