Thao
Thao v. County of Siskiyou
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 XAO THAO, Case No.: 2:23-cv-02563-DJC-CKD 12 Plaintiff(s), 13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 18 The named defendant has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil 19 Procedure 5. No further service is permitted without leave of the Court, good cause 20 having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 21 II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS 22 No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without 23 leave of the Court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson 24 v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 27 604 (9th Cir. 1992). 25 III. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 26 Discovery matters that do not implicate the schedule of the case or that do not 27 relate to sealing or redaction of documents related to dispositive motions are referred 28 to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, who will hear all discovery disputes 1…