Vang

(PC) Fairchild v. Vang

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20241:23-cv-00917California404 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARABELLA FAIRCHILD, No. 1:23-cv-0917 JLT GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE

RELIEF

14 VANG, et al., (Doc. 13) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Arabella Fairchild seeks injunctive relief related to her prison trust account, asserting that 18 funds from a settlement were wrongfully taken. (Doc. 9 at 2-3, 6.) The magistrate judge found 19 the Court has no jurisdiction over the individuals she believes wrongfully took the funds at this 20 time, because the matter has not been served. (Doc. 13 at 3.) Therefore, the magistrate judge 21 found the “motion for injunctive relief must be denied at the outset,” and recommended the 22 motion be denied. (Id. at 3, 6.) 23 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified her that any 24 objections were due no later than February 20, 2024. (Doc. 13 at 6.) The Court advised Plaintiff 25 that the failure to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.