Escobedo
Escobedo v. Gazebo Gardens, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9] JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-01390-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
11 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 12 | GAZEBO GARDENS, INC., et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
13 Defendants. (ECF No. 15) 14 15 On February 29, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 16 | with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. (ECF No. 15.) In light of the 17 | stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson 18 | v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice 19 | and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 21 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 22