Sandoval

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:18-cv-00968-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

13 v. (ECF No. 41)

14 SANDOVAL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

15 Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: EXHAUSTION (ECF No. 38) 16

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 18 I. Background 19 Plaintiff Colin M. Randolph (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 21 Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Benavides and Carrillo for excessive 22 force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendants Sandoval, Speidell, and 23 Benavides for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. 24 On February 2, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that 25 the undisputed facts in the record prove that Plaintiff failed to…