Sandoval

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:18-cv-00968-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 41)

SANDOVAL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: EXHAUSTION (ECF No. 38)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 I. Background Plaintiff Colin M. Randolph (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Benavides and Carrillo for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendants Sandoval, Speidell, and Benavides for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. On February 2, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that the undisputed facts in the record prove that Plaintiff failed to…