Flores

Flores v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20241:23-cv-01735California336 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RAYMOND FLORES, Case No. 1:23-cv-01735-CDB

9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION TRANSFERRING

ACTION TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF

10 v. CALIFORNIA

11 TESLA, INC., ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE

12 Defendant. COMPLAINT

13 (Doc. 11)

14

15 Pending before the Court is the stipulation of the parties, filed February 27, 2024, for 16 order transferring this action to the Central District of California. (Doc. 11). The parties 17 represent that transfer is warranted given that an earlier-filed action pending in that District 18 (Reynolds v. Tesla, Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-09665-HDV-RAO (C.D. Cal.)) raises substantially 19 similar claims as alleged in the action pending before this Court. Id. 20 Under the first-to-file rule, a court may dismiss a complaint or claim that is duplicative, 21 transfer all or parts of the case to the first-filed district or stay all or parts of the case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.