Musharbash

Musharbash v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20242:22-cv-02320California4,689 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANA MUSHARBASH, No. 2:22-cv-02320-DAD-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

Defendant. DISMISS ONE OF PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS (Doc. No. 11)

17 This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and to dismiss one of plaintiff’s claims. (Doc. No. 11.) On June 30, 2023, the pending motion was taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 14.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant in part and deny in part defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and deny defendant’s motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND On September 12, 2022, plaintiff Rana Musharbash filed a complaint in Solano County Superior Court initiating this suit against her former employer defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.