Bernard

(PS) Peden v. Bernard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20242:23-cv-02268California287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESLEY ELVIS PEDEN,, No. 2:23-cv-02268-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER GEORGE BERNARD, Defendant. 16 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 5, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file objections has passed, and neither party filed objections. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.