(PC) Romero Diaz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20241:23-cv-01758California372 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OSCAR ROMERO DIAZ Case No.: 1:23-cv-01758 JLT SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

13 v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TO PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 20 DAYS

CORRECTIONS AND

15 REHABILITATION, et al., (Docs. 8, 9)

16 Defendants.

17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter 19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 20 Rule 302. 21 The magistrate judge recommended that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 22 be denied because Plaintiff has sufficient funds in his prisoner trust account to pay the $405.00 23 filing fee for this action. (Doc. 9.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on 24 Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Id. at 3.) The Court 25 advised him that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.